[btthevoiceMember]

https://whyp.it/tracks/189085/magic-oldies-6-jingles?token=POr4o

[WAVAMember]

No. Awful.

[essexmaster247Member]

WAVA wrote:

No. Awful.

Agree entirely.

If he is legitimately charging for these, he’s ripping people off. There are many better alternatives available and the phrase “you get what you pay for” is all so relevant in this instance. Can you please stop sharing these now, as they’re hurting my ears and do not represent a true jingle.

• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .
• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .
• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .

[Neil LeibowitzMember]

I suppose you think “Reelworld Jingles” are “True” jingles?

[essexmaster247Member]

Neil Leibowitz wrote:

I suppose you think “Reelworld Jingles” are “True” jingles?

Your assumption is majorly incorrect.

As you buy real jingles, which can be found on this forum, you surely cannot think that these AI generations are good – they sound like they’ve been chopped together! If you really want to have jingles re-sung, save some cash and have them done by REAL people. Support the business that we all love and have something that is truly crafted by professionals.

• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .

[WAVAMember]

You may not like them but Reelworld use real singers.

[btthevoiceMemberAuthor]

How much does Reel World charge?
I’m getting $50 or so.. and I’m selling to little stations, mostly WEB who can’t afford anything else.
I’m doing this as a hobby. I don’t need to compete.
I certainly don’t need to be told to stop posting by somebody who seems to know what will sell and what won’t.
I’m doing just fine thanks.
In closing.. I’ll just post another link to some I did for a guy yesterday.

https://whyp.it/tracks/191095/kzzc-alt-2-jingles?token=HKLaE

[RowinMember]

Thanks for sharing, Bob. I find these AI generated jingles interesting. I think it’s almost incredible what computers are capable of. And we all know that technology doesn’t stop and is getting better every day.

Do I prefer a seven voice group and real people playing real instruments? Yes, I personally do and probably will always do. That doesn’t mean I will reject AI productions. It’s among us, so I think we should embrace it. And I do believe there is a market for these productions (maybe especially for younger people who didn’t grow up with JAM and TM and seven voice harmonies by real people).

[btthevoiceMemberAuthor]

Thank you Rowin for a kind, thoughtful and constructive comment.
If its ok with “that other guy” I’ll just continue to do what I’m doing, and from time-to-time share same with the group.
Take care.

[UKJinglesMember]

Bob, They are great and I’ve been doing the same!
AI is mostly wonderful (apart from all the FAKE Jesus photos on Facebook)
Hopefully I’ll be long dead before it takes over the world! 🤣😂🤣

[TigerQ105Member]

WAVA wrote:

You may not like them but Reelworld use real singers.

So does JAM and TM, etc, etc.

Once again, while AI is taking over the radio industry, we can now replicate real newsreaders and listeners ‘call-in’ testimonials using AI. But we must remember that those AI stuff will NEVER replace the real, authentic jingle singers we adore, and what makes each jingle company sound unique to their tastes.

Sure, I love both JAM and Reelworld and the like, but eh, whatever floats your boat. But remember~ AI will never outsmart real, human singers. Period.

[btthevoiceMemberAuthor]

We can differ on all this. A rich dialogue is healthy. Crass disparagement of someones efforts to do something creative and beneficial to them is not.
My main line is voice over. I saw the writing on the wall about a year and a half ago and decided to get “on the train” rather that “get run over by it”.
I aligned myself with Eleven Labs and it was one of the most intelligent and financially beneficial moves I’ve made in my entire VO career.
Now my voice is not only making me money while I sleep, its becoming a legacy in countless documentaries, YouTUBE, Tic Tock and Instagram video.
So say what you want about AI. And, “never replace human voices” ? I think that’s a statement that has already been proven to be wrong.
I’ve been in the music and voice business for about 65 years, and while in some cases, I can still tell real from AI, I keep reminding myself that the AI wave is still a “baby” and it will only become more real, more convincing and more a replacement for human efforts in a very short time.
So, produce your jingles with actual singers while you can. Make your money while you can. And come face-to-face with the reality of the industry.
( and.. when no one’s looking.. teach yourself how to make jingles using AI )
🙂

• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .

[essexmaster247Member]

btthevoice wrote:

If its ok with “that other guy” I’ll just continue to do what I’m doing, and from time-to-time share same with the group.

Look, if these were actually good, then I’d be all for it. I’ve heard AI samples that are so much better than this.

In all honesty, these sound like the jingles that were ripped-off on the pirate stations I used to listen to in the late ’60s. If people are spending money on that, more fool them – you can achieve that sound for free. It would be better spent on a good imaging package if budget is a problem.

You are practically saying that you’re looking to make a quick buck, and that’s not admirable.

• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .

[btthevoiceMemberAuthor]

I get more positive comments than negative in general.
I don’t get paid my “quick buck” unless the customer is happy.
So, no. I don’t feel like I’m taking advantage of anyone.
Enough back-biting. I’ve said my piece and you’ve said yours.

[Neil LeibowitzMember]

“Real Singers” whose jingles sounbd like something “out of this world”! Bob’s A-I stuff sounds good to my ears. It’s called “perception”! You like what you like –I like what I like! if you can criticize Bob’s efforts, then I can certainly criticize “Reelworld”!

[btthevoiceMemberAuthor]

Hats off Neil

[mjb1124Member]

Admittedly I don’t think they sound that bad – frankly more to my taste than some (not all) modern CHR jingles that sound so heavily autotuned, processed, synthetic, and formulaic that they might as well be AI generated. My concerns are more on the ethical end of things. I don’t want to see real writers, musicians, and singers get replaced by technology. Thankfully you still have outfits like Jingle Works that can offer the real deal for those on a budget, as well as the big names in the jingle industry that we all know.

• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .
• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .
• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .
• This reply was modified 5 months ago by .

[bobgreenradioMember]

you know, a little nip and tuck here and there and they are fine.

[essexmaster247Member]

Neil Leibowitz wrote:

“Real Singers” whose jingles sounbd like something “out of this world”! Bob’s A-I stuff sounds good to my ears. It’s called “perception”! You like what you like –I like what I like! if you can criticize Bob’s efforts, then I can certainly criticize “Reelworld”!

When did anyone say that you couldn’t criticise Reelworld? Fool.

[Laotian_12_inMember]

Speaking of AI, I used an AI tool to make some radio jingles from a fictional country I made called “the Laotianlands” out of preexisting jingles, can you recognise any of the original jingles used?

[essexmaster247Member]

Laotian_12_in wrote:

Speaking of AI, I used an AI tool to make some radio jingles from a fictional country I made called “the Laotianlands” out of preexisting jingles, can you recognise any of the original jingles used?

I recognise the jingles, but I sure can’t understand the majority of the vocals.

[Neil LeibowitzMember]

well, I can–NOW, who’s the “Fool”?

[Neil LeibowitzMember]

Neil Leibowitz wrote:

well, I can–

[Author]

Posts