[IainJohnston]

Bring back “The Evans & Martin Frontal Sound” !?!
o:)

[omproMember]

Now I have to seriously ask myself how old you actually are.

You obviously misunderstood my message. What I meant is that at some point in life you also have to live with the innovations in the area of ​​Jingles. You can’t expect that Jingles from the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s would still be considered up-to-date today. That’s just unrealistic.

You quote part of a post of mine and twist it to a different meaning. That’s why I won’t answer any further.

nleibo;c-77098 wrote:

You’re 56 years old–and you post “”Otherwise this will become a very old club with +70 year old members”–as if there’s something WRONG with “70 year old members”–so I basically replied I “would like to be around in 14 years when YOU are 70”–and someone YOUNGER posts a comment like that–“disrespectful”? YUP!

[omproMember]

I agree!

TigerQ105;c-77101 wrote:

michi;c-77100 wrote:

For an internet only project, this is too much for too little. LFM is what I would call, the high end of the budget jingle companies. Their product is no TM, Ignite or ReelWorld.. but for a terrestrial with a limited budget.. it’s better than nothing and compared with the other “budgets” out there, it is one of the better ones. For internet projects, just wait for iJingles to open up again. I recently got 8 cuts for $2K and they sound beyond awesome.

“Better than nothing” indeed. I think LFM really pulled up a very good package for small radio stations.
It’s just that the vocals need to be improved little by little.

[omproMember]

IainJohnston;c-77083 wrote:

“These new companies, I love them”

LFM have been around since 2004 – means they’re probably as old as PAMS were eventually?

Can you tell whom you quoted?

[omproMember]

Besides that PAMS is a little older. Too bad you do not know.

[Author]

Posts