GCAP 2007 jingles – soporiphic?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4906
    IainJohnston
    Member

      I've just played the sample of one of Leicester Sound's 2007 jingles
      that was posted a couple of days ago by Cubwolf…

      …and it sounded totally lifeless! I don't think I've ever heard
      a jingle sung with such a lack of enthusiasm!

      And the the 3-note downbeat “Leicest-er Sound”
      logo was used (much more brightly) by Radio Forth
      more than 20 years ago on their “Close To You” packages.

      #31761
      cubwolf
      Member

        Thats excactly what i thought!
        The package as done for Trent FM is on the Music 4 site and there are some slightly better ones.
        I suppose writing a package that can be adapted to 21 stations is a thankless task.

        #31762
        NickyS
        Member

          we actually it'll be more than 21 stations once it's rolled out everywhere …

          #31767
          IainJohnston
          Member
          Author

            I suppose writing a package that can be adapted to 21 stations is a thankless task

            Worse than that Dave, they're claiming it will be for
            35 stations!

            Fortunately (?) for us here in Scotland there is only
            ONE GCAP station – XFM – we've never had any “Mix”
            etc stations for listeners to hear all the “cloning”.

            Unfortunately…looks like GMG could be about to own
            almost everything here (other than “tin pot FMs”) if
            the latest EMAP sell-off stories come to fruitition – so
            even less chance of hearing decent jingles in future :(

            #31770
            IainJohnston
            Member
            Author

              Just to add to the general current debate on “Identikit”
              jingle packages…

              http://www.normanb.net/notes.htm

              An article from Ken R Deutch, published via Norman Barrington's
              website, mainly about PAMS as was, but also some very
              valid remarks about today's products (and the people who
              buy them).

              A parrticular quote…

              “PAMS jingles were not created by focus groups. Nor were they designed to offend the smallest number of people. Each station using them was encouraged to customize its cuts with variable logos and a wide variety of lyrics.

              Today's jingle packages are often designed by group programmers who dictate that all stations using them have almost identical versions. In contemporary jingles just a few call letter melodies are used. While IDs are still labor-intensive, they have become standardized to the point where it is impossible to identify a producer by its product. Jingles have become commodities. They no longer create trends; they follow them”

              Ken has it “spot-on” I would suggest? (and the description is also extremely
              accurate in describing today's radio stations programming in general, not just
              the jingles used on them!)

              #31771
              LenGroat

                “they have become standardized to the point where it is impossible to identify a producer by its product”

                PERFECTLY stated ~ BRILLIANT!

                but many people do put up with living in an homogonised society?

                #31772
                Inferno

                  Seems to be the fashion these days to stanardise. BBC Local Radio packages were standardised and still are to an extent. Most companies use the same instrumentation and vocal styles. Mind you, better than about 6 years ago!

                  However, when I heard that Gcrap stations were using sund jingles i was pleased but when i found out they were using the same package, my heart sank…again! Wjhat is wrong with having four different types of packages for a region of Gcrap stations? At least there would be a bit of variety instead of conveyer belt jingles…and i bet it was cheaper doing it this way which is also another factor. I bet the programme directors say “Who's going to care? Only jingle anoraks”. I would not be suprised.

                  #31773
                  Oliver

                    only just noticed that you can select the station on the demo from trent or invicta!

                    #31782
                    simon_t123
                    Member

                      How ? I coudl only find Trent Fm stuff, even though I did try & stick Essex FM into the mp3 filenames the site hosts … Didnt work mind !

                      #31783
                      simon_t123
                      Member

                        Ahhh they changed the page :)

                        #31785
                        Paul

                          In The Jingle Network Podcast we'll have resings for Invicta FM, Red Dragon, Fox FM, Chiltern Radio, BRMB and GWR Bristol.

                          #31794
                          martinlester
                          Member

                            I am not 100% convinced that this one size fits all approach for example I live in Kent

                            so can hear both Invicta and Capital so I assume that both are GCAP and both will have the same jingles :((

                            #31796
                            simon_t123
                            Member

                              Not sure Capital will air these, it seems to follow a different path. Your overlaps might be Southern FM / Essex FM Tho, I'm not sure if they will air so quick on stations already airing recently purchased jingles, Essex for example mau well have spent a fortune on their Reelworld IDs ?

                              #31798
                              NickyS
                              Member

                                Are Capital part of The One Network? I thought they were a stand alone?

                              Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
                              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.